Antonio
Gramsci [ 1891 - 1937 ] was an
Italian revolutionary, subversive, chief theoretician and
Secretary of the
Communist Party of Italy, who worked out that the "inevitable" revolution
of the proletariat
predicted by orthodox Marxism had not occurred by the early 20th
century. His answer was to subvert the
Christian culture
of Europe which
promotes civilized values. This means
infiltrating society from the top down. Marx advocated doing it from
the bottom up. 'Workers
of the world unite. You have nothing to lose but your chains' - It sounded good but didn't quite work. Taking
over the Education industry especially the universities is a major
part of the attack. Infiltrating and discrediting
Holy Mother Church was more
important in Italy than elsewhere. It was his Long
March Through The Institutions.
Innocents
Clubs
Are clubs for the well meaning, who
are eager to believe the best of anyone who can be depicted as a
victim of British Imperialism or something else they don't like. The Church of England is
a de facto
enemy, full of good will to all men unless, perhaps they are English.
The innocents, the gullible are very keen on promoting the idea of
racism, the idea
that we oppress foreigners. But there is no level playing field in
this concept. Blacks are allowed to hate us. Blacks must be pandered
to. Innocents Club
is the term
coined by
Willi Münzenberg,
the master
propagandist who was talent spotted by Lenin in
Switzerland.
Invisible
Dictatorship
QUOTE
An invisible dictatorship was a term coined by
Mikhail Bakunin to describe his concept of clandestine revolutionary
leadership. Bakunin also used the term invisible legion and
invisible network to describe his invisible dictatorship.........
Modern uses of the term
The term has also been used more recently, for
instance by the Independent Voters Alliance United States of America to
describe the two party system currently existing in the
USA
which they claim makes voting useless as the "choices in every election are
limited to candidates financed by the same money sources."
Such viewpoints have become more widespread in the USA particularly since the
heightened security after
9/11.
UNQUOTE
An anarchist explains. It is like our
Invisible Enemy, a fair description of
Her Majesty's Government
with its commitment to change and the destruction of
England. A lot of other
governments in the West have been taken over in the same way. America is just
the most obvious victim. We are ruled by
Zionist Occupation Governments,
ZOG for short.
Entryism
QUOTE
Entryism is a political tactic by
which an organisation encourages members to infiltrate
another organisation in an attempt to gain recruits, or take
over entirely. In situations where
the organisation being "entered" is hostile to entryism, the
entryists may engage in a degree of subterfuge to hide the
fact that they are, in fact, an organisation in their own
right........ Other entryist groups have gone to the extent
of hiding both their political views and their
organisational existence......... Entryism is often
(but not always) done secretly and often in organisations
run on
democratic centralist lines. Entryism is seen by some as
a logical conclusion from
Leninist political theory which postulates that a
"revolutionary vanguard" can successfully foment a
revolution within a larger
capitalist society, but according to some, the strategy
of entryism is as old as politics itself.
UNQUOTE
It means infiltration. His Majesty's
Government, just like
His Majesty's
Allegedly Most Loyal Opposition. So is England.
One of the guilty is
Miliband, a Jew, son of a communist subversive and grandson of
a murderous traitor. He was now in the Cabinet and was mentioned by the
BBC as a
possible prime minister. Notice the sneer; he is an arrogant rogue.
Deep Entryism
QUOTE
Deep entryism/entryism
In these types of entryism, entryists engage in
a long-term perspective in which they work within an organisation for
decades in hopes of gaining influence and a degree of power and perhaps even
control of the larger organisation. In 'entryism sui generis' (of a special
type), Trotskyists, for example, do not openly argue for the building of a
Trotskyist party. 'Deep entryism' refers to the long duration..........
UNQUOTE
The idea is entirely straightforward; infiltrating for the long term. In
Espionage they are called sleepers and are activated by their handlers when
wanted. The Wiki does not bother to point out that there has been a broad
front penetration of civilization using this approach. The
BBC is totally
dominated by them. Invisible Enemy, a book
by Edward Abboud tells us about it and names the guilty.
Gramsci's
Legacy Of Hate And Conflict
Ideas are more dangerous
than
weapons because they control men's minds and actions. Here are some
spread by the Education industry and the
Main Steam Media.
There is no truth,
only competing agendas.
All Western (and especially American)
claims to moral superiority over Communism/Fascism/Islam are vitiated
by the West’s history of racism and colonialism:-
1. There
are no objective standards by which we may judge one culture to be
better than another. Anyone who claims that there are such standards
is an evil oppressor.
2. The prosperity of the West is built on
ruthless exploitation of the Third World; therefore Westerners
actually deserve to be impoverished and miserable.
3. Crime is
the fault of society, not the individual criminal. Poor criminals are
entitled to what they take. Submitting to criminal predation is more
virtuous than resisting it.
4. The poor are victims. Criminals
are victims. And only victims are virtuous. Therefore only the poor
and criminals are virtuous. (Rich people can borrow some virtue by
identifying with poor people and criminals.)
5. For a virtuous
person, violence and war are never justified. It is always better to
be a victim than to fight, or even to defend oneself. But
‘oppressed’
people are allowed to use violence anyway; they are merely reflecting
the evil of their oppressors.
6. When confronted with terror, the
only moral course for a Westerner is to apologize for past sins,
understand the terrorist’s point of view, and make
concessions.
These ideas have been released into the wild but have a virtue.
When they are stated clearly and looked in the eye they are quite
clearly false or misguided but they do have an attraction for a
certain type of mind.
Gramsci's Grand Plan
Father Thornton explains how
Gramsci decided to destroy civilization. The Church was very good on
analysis. Their follow through has not been effective.
QUOTE
Gramsci
believed that if Communism achieved "mastery of human
consciousness," then labour camps and mass murder would be
unnecessary. How does an ideology gain such mastery over
patterns of
thought inculcated by cultures for hundreds of years? Mastery over
the consciousness of the great mass of people would be
attained,
Gramsci contended, if Communists
or their sympathizers gained control of the organs of
culture--churches, education, newspapers, magazines,
the electronic
media, serious literature, music, the visual arts, and so on. By winning "cultural
hegemony"
to use Gramsci's own term, Communism would control
the deepest
wellsprings of human thought and imagination. One
need not even control all of the information itself if one can
gain control over the minds that assimilate that information.
Under such conditions, serious
opposition disappears
since men are no longer capable of grasping the arguments of
Marxism's opponents.
Men will indeed "love
their servitude," and will not even realize that it is
servitude.
However, the hard core of the Communist
movement consisted of ruthless criminals, clear-eyed in their understanding
of the intellectual errors of Marxism, who were willing to employ any
necessary means to obtain the power they sought. For such hardened,
hate-intoxicated conspirators, ideology is a tactic, a means of mobilizing
supporters and rationalizing criminal actions.
Those who accept uncritically the idea
that "Communism is dead" fail to understand the true nature of the enemy.
Communism is not an ideology in which one believes. Rather, it is a criminal
conspiracy in which one enlists. Although Lenin professed to revere Marx's scribblings as sacred writ, once his
Bolsheviks had seized power in Russia,
Lenin freely modified Marxism to suit his needs. The same was true of
Stalin. The Bolsheviks did not come to power in Russia by any uprising of
the workers and peasants, but by a coup d'état, orchestrated by a tightly
disciplined Marxist cadre and ultimately consolidated by civil war. They
also received "lest it be forgotten" critical help from Western political
and banking elites. [ See Wall Street
Helps Bolsheviks - Editor ]
In similar fashion, Communism did not come
to power in Eastern Europe by revolution, but rather through the imposition
of that system by a conquering Red Army and, once again, through the
corrupt connivance of conspirators in the West. In China, Communism came to
power through civil war, aided by the Soviets and by traitorous elements in
the West.
UNQUOTE
That seems clear enough as a description of
what is being done to us. The
BBC, the object of my particular
loathing is in the forefront of telling us that Englishmen are
inferior to blacks and that we owe it to them to let them get away
with murder, rape, et cetera.
Gramsci Versus Tocqueville
Alexis de
Tocqueville was a French traveller who admired
the America of the Nineteenth Century for its freedom, something which makes him very
different from Gramsci.
Marxist Takeover Of The Ruling Classes
Doctor Gabb has been over the ground and puts his view.
Salami Tactics
Are a similar approach used by communists in Hungary.
Subversives
Here are a few of the enemy, the vicious rather than the Useful Idiots
they control.
Transmission Belts
Are the propaganda conduits that Lenin used. Trade unions
were going to tell the workers what to think. Nowadays it the
Main Steam Media and the
Education industry which do the same job; very effective
they are too. Then the
Internet came along to bypass them and tell the truth.
Thank God for it but do not believe everything you read on it. Perhaps THE go to
source is the site run by Ron Unz at
https://www.unz.com/. His writers are free
men all. None are beholden to MSM proprietors for a living
Useful Idiots
These are Antonio's chosen tools and deadly effective,
driven as they are by a certainty of their moral superiority. They
have swallowed the idea of Western Guilt,
the view that the white man is evil and lesser races are his victims.
Who is Antonio
Gramsci?
Alberto Luzárraga says; You had better
learn. Mr. Luzárraga tells us about the difference between
Antonio and Alexis de Tocqueville; between slavery and liberty, between mass
murder and prosperity. Mr Luzárraga is very much on the right lines.
