Genocide Looms For White Farmers
In South Africa
Blacks are sincerely Racist. In fact
they are tribalist too. They have been manipulated by Jews.
cunning Jews,
Racist Jews to be sure but manipulated none the less.
Joe Slovo was only one of them, part of the
South African Communist Party,
being used by rich Jews like Harry Oppenheimer,
who ran De Beers.
Four Out Of Ten Murder Victims In South Africa Are White
QUOTE
It’s business as usual in South Africa where the ANC has won a predictable
victory in the first elections since the death of Mandela. It is unlikely there
will be any big changes in a country mired by one corruption
scandal after another, which is now the murder capital of the world and
which is slowly sliding into economic chaos.
And one thing that will not be changing soon will be a relentless upward tick in the grim daily toll of murders of Whites by Blacks. Around 50 murders take place in South Africa every day and according to Genocidewatch around 20 of these are of Whites by Blacks — a grossly disproportionate figure for a minority who make up only nine per cent of the total population. This and the shrill, blood curdling threats from some Black politicians mean many Boers fear a White bloodbath in the future......
Ethnic hatred is a clear factor in these killings, with murder scenes often featuring such graffiti as “Kill the Boer” in blood. An unspeakable level of savagery is also a feature. Gruesome torture with pangas, electric irons or kitchen implements are frequent features and the average victim is elderly. On the day Mandela died, an 84-year-old Afrikaaner woman was robbed in her own home, held down and drowned in her bath........
You might think that with their own history of persecution and sensitivity to pogrom-style killings the Jewish community might be sympathetic. You would be mistaken. For organised Jewry is at the forefront of attempts to howl down, marginalise and discredit the White claims.
A good example came in the South African TV interview of the Red October founder [ Sunette Bridges ]
where the presenter, an “anti-racist” Jewish judge began by telling the TV audience that the claims are exaggerated...........
Both the Africaans and the English-speaking media now give only the most cursory accounts of farm violence often omitting names, ethnicities or progress of investigations. (An exception is the current celebrity murder trial of Olympic athlete Oscar Pistorius [ because he is white - Editor ])
Prominent amongst these naysayers are the South African bureau of an international NGO called Africa Check and the university-based Centre for the Study of Open Democracy which are both largely Jewish-run and funded..........
It is worth remembering that the ANC was largely a Jewish creation and the senior ranks were dominated by Jewish communists who talent-spotted and groomed new talent like the young Nelson Mandela whose legal career owed everything to Jewish patronage (see “The role of Jews in South Africa since 1948” by Sam Davidson, The Occidental Quarterly, Summer, 2011). Jews also dominate the main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance. Both its current leader and previous leader and many of its shadow cabinet are Jewish......
Soon Johannesburg will be blessed with the opening of that ultimate
international status symbol of Jewish triumphalism — it’s own
Holocaust Museum in a plush new building on Jan Smuts Avenue. It
will be the third holocaust centre to be opened in South Africa and all schools
will be required to visit it. You can bet that the opening ceremony will
be a lavish affair.
UNQOTE
Genocide is policy.
So is pandering to Jews. They own the gold mines. They marketed
Mandela as a world figure. Jews are setting up the
New World Order.
Ethnic Cleansing
Ethnic cleansing is an ugly euphemism for mass murder, terrorism
and driving people from their land. It is popular with the
Zionist thugs running
Israel. So is the cant
going with it.
Eight
Stages of Genocide
This theoretical paper does not address the issue of
governments being perverted, becoming the Enemy
Within.
UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
QUOTE
Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the
following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a
national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article III: The following acts shall be punishable:
(a) Genocide;
(b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
(c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
(d) Attempt to commit genocide;
(e) Complicity in genocide.
UNQUOTE
Article III covers a lot of
politicians.
PS This site tells us that
Raphael Lemkin is
against genocide. In fact
Lemkin is a Jew who will have contrived not to know that
Zionist crazies who run Israel are keen mass
murderers.
Genocide ex Wiki
QUOTE
Genocide
is the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic,
racial, religious, or national group.
While a precise
definition varies among genocide scholars, a
legal definition is found in the 1948
United Nations
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG).
Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts
committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a
national,
ethnical,
racial or
religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious
bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the
group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction
in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the
group; [and] forcibly transferring children of the group to another group."
Because of the insistence of
Joseph Stalin, this definition of genocide under international law does
not include political groups.
UNQUOTE
This what Jews are doing to
Christendom now.
Genocide
In Armenia
Politics in the Middle East
are a blood sport but telling the truth is not good for the
perpetrators. Jews claim it was not genocide. Who believes a Jew? A mug punter.
Eight Stages of Genocide
You might find this enlightening. There again you might not.
White genocide conspiracy theory
ex Wiki
The title is verbatim & the Wiki's corruption at its most blatant.
QUOTE
The white genocide conspiracy theory is a
neo-Nazi,
alt-right,
white nationalist/supremacist
conspiracy theory,[1]
which contends that any one of mass
immigration,
racial integration,
miscegenation,
low fertility rates,
abortion,
governmental land-confiscation
from whites, organised
violence[2]
or
eliminationism are being promoted in either predominantly white countries,
or supposedly
white-founded countries, to deliberately replace, remove, or liquidate white
populations,[3]
dismantle white
collective power,[4]
turn the countries minority-white, and hence cause
white
people to become
extinct through
forced assimilation[2]
or violent
genocide.[5]
The conspiracy theory was developed by the neo-Nazi David Lane in about 1995. The phrase "anti-racist is a code word for anti-white", coined by high-profile white nationalist Robert Whitaker, is commonly associated with the topic of white genocide.[6][7] It has appeared on billboards in the United States near Birmingham, Alabama[8] and Harrison, Arkansas.[9] The conspiracy theory had already been purported [ sic ] in Nazi Germany by a pamphlet written for the "Research Department for the Jewish question" of Walter Frank's "Reich Institute" with the title "Are the White Nations Dying? The Future of the White and the Colored Nations in the Light of Biological Statistics".[10]
The conspiracy theory has been expressed in South Africa and France. It has also been commonly used both interchangeably with,[11] and as a broader and more extreme version of Renaud Camus's 2012 The Great Replacement conspiracy theory, which focuses on the white Christian population of France.[12][13]
In August 2018, US President Donald Trump
was accused of endorsing the conspiracy theory in a
foreign policy tweet instructing Secretary of State
Mike
Pompeo to investigate South African "land and farm seizures and
expropriations and the large scale killing of farmers",[14][15][16]
claiming that the "South
African government is now seizing land from
white farmers".[17]
The often critical narrative derived from
farm attacks, and
land reform, is an established subset theme of the broader conspiracy
theory,[4]
portrayed in media as a form of gateway or proxy issue to "white genocide"
within the wider context of the
Western world.[18][17]
The topic in relation to South Africa and
Zimbabwe
is also simply used interchangeably with the subject,[19]
as well as being used by white nationalists as a
parabolic
concept, or cautionary tale,[20]
to justify policies to retain or increase white majorities in nation-states,
or otherwise maintain their vision of
white supremacy.[3][17]
UNQUOTE
The
Wikipedia
is just as much a Propaganda machine as the
Main Stream Media but it works within a limitation,
trying to look impartial. In that it is just like the BBC.
Naturally enough it does not mention that Jews, the
Zionist crazies who run
Palestine, the Stolen Land they call
Israel are very keen on
Ethnic Cleansing to get rid of
Blacks & Arabs. The Wiki knows a lot about lying by
omission; it mentions Camus but not
Jean Raspail or his best known book,
Camp Of The Saints, written about Third World immigration flooding
civilization. It annoyed various people. It is rather like the
Protocols of the Learned
Elders of Zion; it tells the truth or something very like it. The
objectors are the same sort of rogue too. M Raspail's book was published in
1973. It is prescient.
The Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory ex Wiki
QUOTE
The great replacement (French:
le grand remplacement) is a far-right conspiracy theory,[1][2][3][4][5]
which states that the white Catholic French population, and white Christian
European population at large,[6]
is being systematically replaced with non-European people,[5]
specifically Middle Eastern, North and Sub-Saharan African populations,[3]
through mass migration and demographic growth. It associates the presence of
Muslims in France with potential danger and destruction of French culture
and civilization.[7]
The conspiracy theory commonly apportions blame to a global and liberal elite,[6] such as Brussels and the European Union, which is portrayed as directing a planned and deliberate plot or scheme to carry out the replacement of European peoples.[4]
The theory has been popularized by
Renaud Camus. This notion of replacement, or of
white genocide, has echoed throughout the rhetoric of many anti-migrant
far-right movements in the West.[8]
Among its main promoters are not only far-right populist parties but also a
wide-ranging network of protest movements (e.g.,
Pegida),
ideological groupuscules (e.g.,
bloc identitaire),[9]
bloggers (e.g.,
Fjordman),
and noted intellectuals (e.g.,
Eric Zemmour). Prominent radical right-wing websites such as
Gates of Vienna,
Politically Incorrect, and
France de Souche have provided a platform for bloggers to diffuse and
popularize the conspiracy theory.[10]
UNQUOTE
This Conspiracy Theory [ the phrase is
a propaganda term ] is essentially the same as the
#White genocide
conspiracy theory. It was advanced by #Renaud
Camus, who seems, surprisingly, not to be another
Left Wing loud mouth.
M Camus
is not alone.
The myth of New World genocide
ex The Spectator
QUOTE
Shortly before the coronation of Charles III, a group of indigenous leaders
from around the commonwealth released a statement. They called on the King
‘to acknowledge the horrific impacts on and legacy of genocide and
colonisation of the indigenous and enslaved peoples,’ including ‘the
oppression of our peoples, plundering of our resources, (and) denigration of
our culture.’ Charles was told to ‘redistribute the wealth that underpins
the crown back to the peoples from whom it was stolen.’ Yet the argument
that Britain should pony up for its historical sins is based on a number of
rickety assumptions.
One of these is that a substantial portion of the wealth of the UK, or the British Crown, derives from slavery or colonial exploitation. Famously, empire often cost more than it brought in. And, like the rest of northwest Europe, the UK was already wealthy before colonialism or the slave trade. Western Europe would have remained rich even in the absence of overseas adventurism. Germany, for example, was one of the world’s richest areas, long before it gained any colonies. It’s true that overseas resources were exploited; but this was not the sole source of Europe’s wealth. Far from it.
Even more questionable than the call for reparations are the claims of ‘genocide’ in the context of New World colonialism. Until a few years ago, only a tiny fringe of historians believed that European colonialism in the New World was ‘genocidal’. In the six-volume, 3,000+ page Cambridge History of the Native Peoples of the Americas (published 1996-2000) several dozen specialists saw fit to mention genocide precisely twice. In both of these instances, the scholars in question do so only to reiterate that it did not apply.
There are many reasons why historians long shied away from using the term ‘genocide’. There was a recognition that the word should be reserved only for extreme cases, such as the Nazis’ attempt to eliminate Europe’s Jews. Using the word to describe the activities of European colonisers and their respective governments surely falls short of this, because the elimination of native populations was seldom – if ever – a deliberate or sustained policy...........
The Spanish government, for example, went to great lengths to protect natives. In 1542, it passed the ‘New Laws of the Indies for the Good Treatment and Preservation of the Indians’. It also established self-governing Republicas de Indios, where Europeans were not allowed to own land. All of this was done with the purpose of increasing Indian population levels – and, by all accounts, it worked: native population levels began to recover soon after. Even when policies came closest to something we would recognise as ‘genocidal’, as during the American Trail of Tears debacle, context reveals a host of reasons why, even here, historians have been reluctant to use this term..............
In recent years, the study of history has become
increasingly politicised. Claims of genocide across the New World have
subsequently emerged – but these are riddled with demographic
exaggerations. New Left darling
Howard Zinn [ a Jew
] acknowledged that Hispaniola,
the island where Columbus first landed in 1492, likely had about 250,000
people.
UNQUOTE
Recall that various Left Wing liars alleged
genocide in Tasmania. Using the Education Industry
to market fraudulent history is part of the Long
March Through The Institutions. They were countered by
Keith Windschuttle in his
book,
The Fabrication Of Aboriginal History.
